Manajemen Infrastruktur Publik Pasca Pemekaran Kabupaten Kerinci Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara
Keywords:
Public infrastructure, splitting, public serviceAbstract
Splitting of Regional is a strategic step taken by the government to improve the quality of implementing governmental tasks in the context of public services, empowerment and development. Regional splitting which is supposed to be a solution in improving the quality of public services and accelerating the pace of development of public infrastructure does not always go well. Various kinds of problems arose in almost every newly created area, both for the main area and for the newly created area. Kerinci Regency and Sungai Penuh City are one of the newly created regions in Indonesia which found the problems as well. This type of research is qualitative using observation and library research methods. The results of the analysis in this article are that the management of public infrastructure after the splitting of the Kerinci district which is hampered has an impact on the process of public services for the society. State administrative law regulates government actions and regulates the relationship between the government and citizens or the relationship between organs of government. This research shows that infrastructure development is hampered either by poor governance management or by prolonged conflicts of interest between elites in the regions, causing some important infrastructure to be unavailable to the community.
Metrics
References
Adryan, Erwin, J. (2018). Pelaksanaan Pemekaran Daerah Kota Sungai Penuh dari Kabupaten Kerinci dan Dampaknya terhadap Wilayah Pinggiran Kota Sungai Penuh. 2(3), 269–282.
Anggara, S. (2018). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Pustaka Setia.
Assyahri, W. (2020). Kualitas Pelayanan, Fasilitas, dan Budaya Kerja Berbasis Digital Governance dalam Rangka Kebahagiaan Masyarakat di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Pariaman. Universitas Negeri Padang.
Assyahri, W., Lanin, D., & Saputra, B. (2021). The External Role of Public Managers in Improving the Quality of Community Services through Delivery to Mentawai Ethnic. Proceedings of the 1st Tidar International Conference on Advancing Local Wisdom Towards Global Megatrends, TIC 2020, 21-22 October 2020, Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia, 570–579. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-10-2020.2311929
Bila, A., & Assyahri, W. (2023). Professionalism And Timeliness In Public Service Management at Class II Immigration Office of Agam. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), 07(01), 64–73.
Daerah, D. A. N. P. (2000). Presiden republik indonesia.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Pustaka Pelajar.
Herawati, N. R. (2011). Pemekaran Daerah Di Indonesia. POLITIKA, 2(7).
Indonesia, P. R. (2014). UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH DENGAN.
Indra Hermawan, Tjahya Supriatna, & Ali Hanafiah Muhi. (2021). Konflik Aset Daerah Antarpemerintah Daerah Pasca-Pemekaran: Studi Kasus Konflik Kepemilikan Bangunan Antara Pemerintah Kabupaten Kerinci Dengan Kota Sungaipenuh Provinsi Jambi. VISIONER : Jurnal Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia, 13(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.54783/jv.v13i1.371
Khairullah, malik C. (2006). evaluasi pemekaran wilayah di Indonesia studi kasus kabupaten lahat. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Kajian Ekonomi Negara Berkembang, 11 no2, 261–277.
Munaf, Y., & Munaf, Y. (2016). Hukum administrasi negara.
Negeri, menteri dalam. (2001). KEPUTUSAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI NOMOR 42 TAHUN 2001. 1–3.
Penuh, S. (2008). UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 25 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN KOTA SUNGAI PENUH DI PROVINSI JAMBI.
Rinaldi, R. (2012). ANALISIS KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK (Studi pada Biro Umum Sekretariat Daerah Propinsi Sumatera Utara). Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1(Kolisch 1996), 49–56.
Sangen, R. (2017). Evaluasi pembangunan di bidang infrastruktur di kabupaten kutai timur pasca pemekaran daerah 1. Jurnal Administrative Reform, 128–138.
Suaib, R. (2020). Jurnal Government of Archipelago Jurnal Government of Archipelago. I.
