Analisis Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Tenaga Medis yang Melakukan Pola Paternalistik kepada Pasien
Keywords:
Doctor, Informed consent, Patient, Paternalistic PatternAbstract
This study aims to determine legal certainty for the implementation of paternalistic medical procedures in Indonesia, forms of legal protection for medical personnel who are sued by patients for applying paternalistic patterns in medical actions, and legal remedies that can be taken by medical personnel who are sued by patients for applying paternalistic patterns in medical treatment. This research is a qualitative research with a normative juridical approach, relying on primary data in the form of laws, secondary data in the form of literature and tertiary data as a complement. As for the results of this study, Permenkes No.209/Menkes/Per/III/2008 Article 4 paragraph (1) and Article 17 KODEKI are rules for allowing informed consent to be deviated, while Article 27 of Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health, Article 45 paragraph (1) Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice, Article 50 of Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice, and IDI Statement regarding Informed consent (Attachment to SKB IDI No 319/PB/A.4/88) informed consent is actually required. So that legal certainty for medical personnel is guaranteed, the provisions regarding the obligation to provide informed consent must be seen as not absolute provisions, as long as the patient is in a serious condition, doctors can ignore informed consent as a feature of the paternalistic pattern in medicine. Forms of legal protection for medical personnel who are sued by patients for applying a paternalistic pattern, namely preventive legal protection (Article 50 of Law 36/2009) and preventive legal protection (UU 36/2009). Legal remedies that can be taken by medical personnel who are being sued by patients for applying paternalistic patterns in medical action, namely through mediation as stated in Law 36/2009
Metrics
References
Afandi, D. (2009). Mediasi: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis. Majalah Kedokteran Indonesia, Vol. 59(5), 189–193.
Akbari, A. R. (2015). Anotasi Putusan Perkara Kelalaian yang Mengakibatkan Kematian No. Register Perkara: 90/Pid.B/2011/PN.MDO & 365 K/PID/2012.
Astuti, E. K. (2003). Hubungan Antara Dokter dan Pasien Dalam Upaya Pelayanan Medis.
Erwinsyahbana, T. (2017). Penelitian Kualitatif Bidang Ilmu Hukum Dalam Perspfektif Filsafat Konstruktivis. Borneo Law Review Journal, Vol. 1(1), 1–17.
Firdaus, M. A. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Profesi Dokter Atas Dugaan Malpraktek Medik Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Yang Berkeadilan. Disertasi.
Foster, G. M. (1986). Antropologi kesehatan (Alih Bahasa Oleh Priyanti Pakan Suryadarma). Universitas Indonesia Press.
Guwandi, J. (2006). Informed consent & informed refusal. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia.
Judi. (2020). Penerapan Informed consent Pada Pasien Gawat Darurat Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Ambarawa. Prosiding “Seminar Rekam Medis Dan Manajemen Informasi Kesehatan.”
Kode Etik Kedokteran tahun 2012.
Kusumaningrum, A. E. (2016). Analisis Transaksi Terapeutik Sarana Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien. Jurnal Ilmiah “Dunia Hukum", Vol. 1(1).
Nasution, B. J. (2005). Hukum Kesehatan Pertanggung Jawaban Dokter. Rienika Cipta.
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 290/Menkes/Per/III/2008 tentang Persetujuan Tindakan Kedokteran.
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Sistem Penanggulangan Gawat Darurat Terpadu.
Perlindungan Hukum Dokter. (2021). Pendewal.Com. https://pendewal.com/perlindungan-hukum-dokter/
Satria, B. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Dokter Atas Dugaan Melakukan Tindak Pidana Medik Dihubungkan Dengan Ajaran Sifat Melawan Hukum Materiil. Jurnal Ilmiah Abdi Ilmu, Vol. 2(1), 114–122.
Sunandar, F. (2013). Kasus dr Ayu, Ini Kronologi Dokter Vs Mahkamah Agung. Viva.Co.Id. https://www.viva.co.id/berita/nasional/462229-kasus-dr-ayu-ini-kronologi-dokter-vs-mahkamah-agung
Winata, A. P. (2015). Studi perbandingan komporitif putusan mahkamah agung No. 365K/Pid/2012 dengan putusan peninjauan kembali No. 79PK/ Pid/2013 resident melakukan tindakan pembedahan. Skripsi.
Wiradharma, D. (1996). Penuntun Kuliah Hukum Kedokteran. Binarupa Aksara.
